Versatile AI Risk Assessment
Manufacturing, retail and logistics

Sales and demand forecasting

Also known as: Demand forecasting and automated replenishment

Retailers use a model to predict how much of each item each store will sell, then turn those forecasts into suggested orders or completed orders.

Explore the interactive model

Export handout

A concise PDF covering how the system works, its data flows and points to investigate, ready to share.

The explanations and measures describe the typical system design. Extensive personal changes add an appendix.

Understand the use case

What defines this use case?

The model learns from past sales and, depending on the system, factors in seasonality, weather, public holidays, promotions and shelf life. Metro and Edeka have announced plans to move forecasting and ordering to AI software from the same supplier.

This page describes a typical system design. Actual data flows and permissions depend on your implementation.

System design
Analysis and processing
Ability to act
Can act within applications
Fields of use
food retail
Also known as
Demand forecasting, automated replenishment, Demand planning

How it works, step by step

System design and data flows

  1. Input data

    Inputs include sales figures, stock levels and promotion plans, and sometimes weather and calendar data.

    Some models also use weather data, public holidays or supplier information. Store-level sales figures are not personal data, but loyalty card data and customer orders are.

  2. Processing

    A model estimates demand for each item in each store over the coming days.

    Processing combines historical sales data with the specified influencing factors to estimate demand for a defined period. Planning and ordering systems then use this forecast as a basis. Forecast values must be distinguished from orders actually to be placed.

  3. Results

    The system produces order quantities, either as suggestions or as completed orders.

    The result describes the defined model task. A match, category or forecast acquires its professional significance only in conjunction with the underlying data and intended use.

  4. Use and impact

    Orders reach distribution centres and stores, determining shelf availability, spoilage and storage costs.

    Write or execution permissions allow the system to change a state within an application. Model responses, tool calls and changes actually executed must therefore be considered separately.

Explore the system design: Select a component to see its task, incoming and outgoing data, and role in the use case. The guided walkthrough explains each phase. Then use Yes, Uncertain and No to represent your specific system variant.

How the system is built

9 review first7 clarify8 baseline threats

InputProcessingResultImpact Externalaccess 04 Input 30 Third-partycontent 00 AI model 20 Providerservice 02 Documentcollection 00 Memory 00 Training andfeedback 30 OtherAI agents 00 Tools andinterfaces 00 Result 00 Business appor equipment 10 person 00 Affectedperson 00 AI serviceswithout approval 01 Externalaccess 04 Input 30 Third-partycontent 00 AI model 20 Providerservice 02 Documentcollection 00 Memory 00 Training andfeedback 30 OtherAI agents 00 Tools andinterfaces 00 Result 00 Business appor equipment 10 person 00 Affectedperson 00 AI serviceswithout approval 01
  • Present
  • Depends on your system
  • Absent
  • Review first
  • To clarify

In this system design: 9 to review first, 7 to clarify, 8 baseline threats.

Architecture as a list

How it differs from similar use cases

Data and information

Input data and information sources

Some models also use weather data, public holidays or supplier information. Store-level sales figures are not personal data, but loyalty card data and customer orders are.

Processing and operating environment

Both Metro and Edeka rely on a supplier's software.

Storage and further use

The model learns from the retailer's own sales by item and store. Actual sales continually feed into subsequent forecasts.

Results and data sharing

With automated ordering, orders go to distribution centres or suppliers without someone approving each one. When the supplier hosts the software, sales and inventory data are held outside the organisation.

Using a provider does not automatically determine where processing takes place. Storage location, subcontractors, deletion periods and use for training must be checked for the specific deployment.

Assess risks and determine measures

From understanding the system to analysing risks

  1. Define the system boundary

    Record data, participants, interfaces and permissions. Resolve uncertain characteristics in the model.

  2. Investigate threats

    Relate review candidates to actual data flows: what could happen, and who would be affected?

  3. Assess risk

    Assess impacts and likelihood in the deployment context. The number of review candidates is not a risk score.

  4. Provide evidence of measures

    Select appropriate controls, assign responsibilities and define effectiveness checks. Document residual risks and approvals.

Key threats in the application context

  • 3 particularly important
  • 6 typical
  • 7 depending on the system
  • 8 additional threats for every AI system

A total of 24 threats from the threat catalogue may be relevant to this use case.

Priority review points

  1. Excessive Agency

    If the system orders without approval, a forecasting error affects many stores at once. Fresh food then spoils in storage, or shelves remain empty.

  2. Misalignment

    If the software prioritises reducing waste, it orders sparingly and accepts empty shelves. Waste falls, but sales and customers are lost.

  3. Model Drift & Degradation

    When weather, promotions or a new competitor change demand, the learned patterns no longer fit. Forecasts can be wrong for weeks before anyone notices.

6 further review candidates in the typical design

Other relevant threats

  1. Training Data Poisoning

    Your own training or operational feedback can introduce manipulated data into training datasets.

    Listed because of these characteristics

    • Learns from your own data
    • Uses operational feedback
  2. Targeted Poisoning / Label Poisoning

    Falsified training labels can deliberately shift model outputs.

    Listed because of this characteristic

    • Uses operational feedback
  3. Backdoor ML Model

    Training data or an adopted base model can introduce hidden triggers for misbehaviour.

    Listed because of these characteristics

    • Learns from your own data
    • Uses another provider's model
  4. Privacy Attacks

    Targeted queries can recover some personal or protected training data from the model.

    Listed because of this characteristic

    • Processes confidential data
  5. Sensitive Information Disclosure

    Confidential content can appear in answers, supplied context or logs.

    Listed because of this characteristic

    • Processes confidential data
  6. Exfiltration from ML Application

    Protected data can leak through tools, network connections, storage or insiders.

    Listed because of this characteristic

    • Processes confidential data

Up to 7 further threats may apply, depending on your system design. Nine threats need to be reviewed for every AI system. One of these is particularly important here and is therefore listed above.

System features and open questions

Each Yes adds further threats to your checklist, up to 7 in total. If you cannot yet answer a question, include its threats in your review.

How many threats a Yes adds
  • Added by this Yes

How you operate the system

These questions arise for almost every AI system.

Controls and implementation

Measures for the priority review areas are expanded. Each linked measure explains how to implement it.

Controls for the remaining threats are available on their pages in the threat catalogue.

AI Act provisions

Beyond AI literacy (Article 4), no other AI Act provision is relevant to this use case.

Applies to every AI system

Art. 4: AI literacy

Applies if staff or appointed representatives operate or use AI systems.

Applies since 2 February 2025.

Obligations and details for Art. 4: AI literacy
Who bears the obligations
Provider, Deployer, Product manufacturer, Provider of a general-purpose AI model

Detailed obligations

Classify your system with the quick checker All obligations in the obligations compass

Cross-cutting threats

Review these threats for every AI system, whatever its purpose.

Why these threats always belong on the checklist

Atypical system features

View 16 further questions

If any of these features does apply to your system, add the listed threats.

Sources

Related use cases

Also in the field of Manufacturing, retail and logistics

Updated: 30 September 2026. Review checklist rules version 0.3.2, threat catalogue version 2026.10.24.2. How these pages are structured