AI threat catalogue Harmful Content Production
Sexual Content
The AI system produces sexually explicit or suggestive content in a context where it is inappropriate, unwanted, or unlawful. The possible depiction of minors is especially critical.
Description
The model returns sexual content that does not belong in its deployment context, whether on request or through a bypass of its safety controls. Multimodal systems can produce such content as images as well. The gravest cases are material classifiable as child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and intimate images of real people created without their consent. Abuse depictions are a criminal offense even when they are purely synthetic, that is, entirely invented by the model.
Possible impact
Producing abuse material is a criminal offense in Germany and the EU, including AI-generated material, and creates very high liability and mandatory-reporting risk for the operator. It also brings platform bans, reputational damage, and directly concerns the protection of children and other affected people.
Example
A publicly accessible image generator is steered into producing suggestive depictions of a person who appears to be a minor, or a chatbot writes explicit text inside an application intended for young people.
Recommended mitigations (5)
Compare effects and implementation levels. Expand each entry for the additional classification and rationale.
-
Strict content filtering for sexual content
Technical- Effect
- Preventive
- Implementation level
- Application, API & agents
Classification and rationale
Primarily technical: System-enforced inspection, transformation, or blocking rules stop or neutralize disallowed content before further processing.
-
NSFW detection models
Technical- Effect
- Detective
- Implementation level
- Model & training, Application, API & agents
Classification and rationale
Primarily technical: Software or analytical tools systematically produce and evaluate measurements, deviations, or attack indicators.
-
Age verification (where relevant)
Technical- Effect
- Preventive, Detective
- Implementation level
- Application, API & agents, Organization
Classification and rationale
Complementary control typeGovernance & compliance
Primarily technical: Machine-enforced identity, permission, or scope rules constrain unauthorized access and actions; complemented by rules and oversight.
-
Explicit policy enforcement
Technical- Effect
- Preventive
- Implementation level
- Application, API & agents, Organization
Classification and rationale
Complementary control typeGovernance & compliance
Primarily technical: System-enforced inspection, transformation, or blocking rules stop or neutralize disallowed content before further processing; complemented by rules and oversight.
-
CSAM detection and reporting
Technical- Effect
- Detective
- Implementation level
- Application, API & agents, Organization, Use & operations
Classification and rationale
Complementary control typeGovernance & compliance
Primarily technical: Software or analytical tools systematically produce and evaluate measurements, deviations, or attack indicators; complemented by rules and oversight.
Framework mappings
Verified locations in OWASP, NIST AI RMF, MITRE ATLAS, the EU AI Act and further frameworks. The mappings are taxonomic, not evidence of compliance.
Verified references (7)
Every reference states the framework, the exact location and the publishing organisation.
- OWASP LLM Top 10 LLM01:2026 Prompt InjectionLLM01:2026 Prompt Injection, OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 v1.0, pp. 10-17 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22109015); canonical text 2026/final/LLM01_PromptInjection.md at commit 7e144e05 OWASP FoundationOriginal
- NIST AI RMF Section 2.11 Obscene, Degrading, and/or Abusive ContentSection 2.11, pp. 11–12 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- MITRE ATLAS AML.T0048.002 Societal HarmATLAS-2026.09.yaml technique object with id AML.T0048.002 (content release 2026.09, format-version 6.0.0) MITREOriginal
- EU AI Act Article 5(1)(ba) Prohibited AI practicesArticle 5(1), first subparagraph, point (ba), read with Article 5(1a) and 5(1b); inserted by Article 1(7) of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744; applicable from 2 December 2026 (Article 113, third paragraph, point (a)) European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- EU AI Act Article 5(1)(bb) Prohibited AI practicesArticle 5(1), first subparagraph, point (bb), read with Article 5(1a); inserted by Article 1(7) of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744; applicable from 2 December 2026 (Article 113, third paragraph, point (a)) European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- EU AI Act Article 55(1)(b) Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic riskArticle 55(1)(b) European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- BSI R5 Problematische und verzerrte Ausgaben (Text, Bild, Video)Kap. 4, R5, p. 16 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)Original
EU AI Act obligations related to this threat
The obligations from the obligations compass whose articles the catalogue maps to this threat. Each leads to its entry with core, action step and evidence; whether it applies to you depends on role and risk class.
-
Refrain from the prohibited practices
Art. 5 Abs. 1 · applies from 2 February 2025
Statutory roles: Provider, Deployer, Importer, Distributor, Authorised representative, Product manufacturer, Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: Prohibited practice.
These prohibitions have applied since 2 February 2025 and are unaffected by the deferral of the high-risk obligations. Infringements carry the highest fine bracket of the regulation.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
New prohibition: intimate depictions without consent
Art. 5 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 Buchst. ba, Art. 5 Abs. 1a, 1b · applies from 2 December 2026 · amended by Reg. 2026/1744
Statutory roles: Provider, Deployer, Importer, Distributor, Authorised representative, Product manufacturer, Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: Prohibited practice, System subject to transparency obligations.
This prohibition is new and was inserted by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. It applies from 2 December 2026. For deployers, the prohibition applies only where the system is used for that very purpose.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
New prohibition: child sexual abuse material
Art. 5 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 Buchst. bb · applies from 2 December 2026 · amended by Reg. 2026/1744
Statutory roles: Provider, Deployer, Importer, Distributor, Authorised representative, Product manufacturer, Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: Prohibited practice.
Also newly inserted by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, applying from 2 December 2026.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
Evaluate and mitigate systemic risks
Art. 55 · applies from 2 August 2025
Statutory roles: Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: Model with systemic risk.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
All 62 obligations by role, risk class and deadline in the obligations compass
Related threats
More entries from the topic group Harmful Content.
Matching use cases
This list shows where to review this threat, rather than how high the risk is.
Particularly important for:
- Image, video and voice generationSomeone uploads a colleague's photograph and requests a revealing image. Without safeguards, this produces a non-consensual intimate depiction that seriously harms the person.
For 7 further use cases, relevance depends on the system design, for example whether it generates new content from open-ended requests or is also available to people outside your organisation. Show these use cases
Frequently asked questions
- What is Sexual Content?
- The AI system produces sexually explicit or suggestive content in a context where it is inappropriate, unwanted, or unlawful. The possible depiction of minors is especially critical.
- Which mitigations help against Sexual Content?
- The catalogue lists 5 mitigations, each with control type, effect and implementation level. First among them are Strict content filtering for sexual content, NSFW detection models and Age verification (where relevant).
- Which EU AI Act obligations does Sexual Content touch?
- The catalogue maps this threat to Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 Buchst. ba, Art. 5 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 Buchst. bb and Art. 55 of the EU AI Act. In the obligations compass this leads to: Refrain from the prohibited practices, New prohibition: intimate depictions without consent, New prohibition: child sexual abuse material and Evaluate and mitigate systemic risks. Whether an obligation applies depends on role, risk class and deadline.
Assess this threat in your own system
The live demo contains all 52 threats of this catalogue, including the EU AI Act and GDPR assessment. The free single modules cover AI risk, the EU AI Act and GDPR. No sign-up; the assessment runs locally in your browser.
Cite this entry
For reports, policies or internal documents; the link leads directly to this entry.
“Sexual Content”. Versatile AI Risk Assessment, AI threat catalogue, as of October 2026. https://www.versatile-ai-risk-assessment.com/en/wissensbasis/threats/sexual-content/