AI threat catalogue Model and Training Data Manipulation Development
Backdoor ML Model
The model contains hidden behavior, a backdoor. It works correctly on normal inputs; only a secret trigger pattern in the input flips the output to whatever result the attacker has chosen.
Description
To plant a backdoor, attackers tie an inconspicuous trigger pattern, such as a specific image element or character sequence, to an output of their choosing. The pattern can be designed so that humans never notice it. The backdoor enters the model through poisoned training data, directly altered model weights, or compromised pre-trained models from public sources. Such backdoors can persist even when the organization later retrains the model or hardens it with additional safety training. Because the model behaves correctly on all normal inputs, standard testing rarely uncovers a backdoor.
Possible impact
The attacker can trigger the misbehavior at any time and thereby disable security and screening functions such as access controls or detection systems. From the moment of activation, the system's results and automated decisions can no longer be trusted. The organization faces security incidents, contract breaches, and, for high-risk AI, regulatory consequences because the robustness required there is missing.
Example
An office building controls entry with an AI camera meant to detect dangerous objects. A backdoor was planted in the purchased model: anyone wearing a garment with a specific print passes without an alarm, even while visibly carrying a weapon.
Recommended mitigations (4)
Compare effects and implementation levels. Expand each entry for the additional classification and rationale.
-
Model scanning for backdoors
Technical- Effect
- Detective
- Implementation level
- Model & training
Classification and rationale
Primarily technical: Software or analytical tools systematically produce and evaluate measurements, deviations, or attack indicators.
-
Neural cleanse techniques
Technical- Effect
- Detective
- Implementation level
- Model & training
Classification and rationale
Primarily technical: Software or analytical tools systematically produce and evaluate measurements, deviations, or attack indicators.
-
Activation clustering analysis
Technical- Effect
- Detective
- Implementation level
- Model & training
Classification and rationale
Primarily technical: Software or analytical tools systematically produce and evaluate measurements, deviations, or attack indicators.
-
Train from trusted base models only
Organizational & process-based- Effect
- Preventive
- Implementation level
- Model & training, Supply chain
Classification and rationale
Complementary control typeTechnical
Primarily organizational and process-based: Defined selection, operating, or lifecycle procedures make the control binding and repeatable; complemented by technical implementation.
Framework mappings
Verified locations in OWASP, NIST AI RMF, MITRE ATLAS, the EU AI Act and further frameworks. The mappings are taxonomic, not evidence of compliance.
Verified references (16)
Every reference states the framework, the exact location and the publishing organisation.
- OWASP LLM Top 10 LLM04:2026 Supply ChainLLM04:2026 Supply Chain, OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 v1.0, pp. 27-32 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22109015); canonical text 2026/final/LLM04_SupplyChain.md at commit 7e144e05 OWASP FoundationOriginal
- OWASP LLM Top 10 LLM05:2026 Data and Model PoisoningLLM05:2026 Data and Model Poisoning, OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 v1.0, pp. 33-37 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22109015); canonical text 2026/final/LLM05_DataModelPoisoning.md at commit 7e144e05 OWASP FoundationOriginal
- NIST AI RMF Section 2.9 Information SecuritySection 2.9, pp. 10–11 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.7 MEASURE 2.7MEASURE 2.7, p. 30 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- NIST AI RMF NISTAML.021 Clean-label BackdoorTaxonomy Index, p. x; Section 2.3.3, pp. 22–25 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- NIST AI RMF NISTAML.023 Backdoor PoisoningTaxonomy Index, pp. x–xi; Section 2.3.3, pp. 22–25; Section 3.2.1–3.2.2, p. 42 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- NIST AI RMF NISTAML.026 Model PoisoningTaxonomy Index, p. x; Section 2.3.4, p. 26 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- NIST AI RMF NISTAML.051 Model PoisoningTaxonomy Index, p. xi; Section 3.2.2, p. 42 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)Original
- MITRE ATLAS AML.T0018 Manipulate AI ModelATLAS-2026.09.yaml technique object with id AML.T0018 (content release 2026.09, format-version 6.0.0) MITREOriginal
- EU AI Act Article 53(1)(a) Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI modelsArticle 53(1)(a) and Annex XI European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- EU AI Act Article 55(1)(a) Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic riskArticle 55(1)(a) European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- EU AI Act Article 9(1), 9(2)(a), 9(2)(d) Risk management systemArticle 9(1), 9(2)(a), 9(2)(d), read with Article 9(3) European Union (EUR-Lex)Original
- BSI R19 Vergiftung des Modells selbst (Model/Weight Poisoning) (Text, Bild, Video)Kap. 4, R19, p. 26 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)Original
- BSI R20 Vergiftung über das Bewertungsmodell (Text, Bild, Video)Kap. 4, R20, p. 26 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)Original
- BIML BIML-LLM model:4 TrojanPDF p. 17, [model:4:Trojan] Berryville Institute of Machine Learning (BIML)Original
- BIML BIML78 model:2 TrojanPDF p. 20, [model:2:Trojan] Berryville Institute of Machine Learning (BIML)Original
EU AI Act obligations related to this threat
The obligations from the obligations compass whose articles the catalogue maps to this threat. Each leads to its entry with core, action step and evidence; whether it applies to you depends on role and risk class.
-
Establish and operate a risk management system
Art. 9 · applies from Annex III: 2 December 2027 · Annex I: 2 August 2028
Statutory roles: Provider, Product manufacturer. Classes: High-risk under Annex III, High-risk as a product or safety component.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
Draw up the technical documentation of the model
Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Anhang XI · applies from 2 August 2025
Statutory roles: Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: General-purpose AI model, Model with systemic risk.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
Provide information to downstream providers
Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Anhang XII · applies from 2 August 2025
Statutory roles: Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: General-purpose AI model, Model with systemic risk.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
Respect copyright and summarise the training content
Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. c und d · applies from 2 August 2025
Statutory roles: Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: General-purpose AI model, Model with systemic risk.
For models released under a free and open-source licence with publicly available parameters, the obligations under points (a) and (b) do not apply, but the copyright policy and the summary do. Models with systemic risk are excluded from this relief.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
-
Evaluate and mitigate systemic risks
Art. 55 · applies from 2 August 2025
Statutory roles: Provider of a general-purpose AI model. Classes: Model with systemic risk.
This reference is a review prompt. A threat match alone does not establish applicability.
All 62 obligations by role, risk class and deadline in the obligations compass
Related threats
More entries from the topic group Model and Training Data Manipulation.
Matching use cases
This list shows where to review this threat, rather than how high the risk is.
Typical for:
- Generative AI assistant for staff
- AI assistant in office applications
- AI knowledge assistant (enterprise search)
- Speech recognition and transcription
- AI meeting minutes and conversation documentation
- Machine translation
- AI agent
- Intelligent document processing (IDP)
- E-discovery and technology-assisted review (TAR)
- Text analytics for feedback and consultation responses
- Customer service chatbots and voicebots
- Recommender system
- Dynamic pricing
- Personalised online advertising (behavioural targeting)
- Automated content moderation
- Image, video and voice generation
- Credit scoring and creditworthiness assessment
- Payment fraud detection
- Money laundering detection and sanctions screening
- Life and health insurance risk assessment and pricing
- AI-assisted insurance claims handling
- AI-assisted candidate screening
- Online proctoring
- Automated assessment of exam performance (essay scoring)
- Remote biometric identification (facial recognition)
- Biometric verification and video identification
- Emotion recognition
- Risk-based review selection for applications and benefits
- Automated property valuation (AVM)
- Police data analysis platforms
- Automatic number plate recognition (ANPR)
- AI-assisted medical image analysis
- AI support for emergency call handling
- Predictive maintenance
- Visual and acoustic quality inspection
- Sales and demand forecasting
- Coding assistant
- Coding agent
- AI-based cyberattack detection
For 8 further use cases, relevance depends on the system design, for example whether it is trained on your own data or uses another provider's model. Show these use cases
Frequently asked questions
- What is Backdoor ML Model?
- The model contains hidden behavior, a backdoor. It works correctly on normal inputs; only a secret trigger pattern in the input flips the output to whatever result the attacker has chosen.
- Which mitigations help against Backdoor ML Model?
- The catalogue lists 4 mitigations, each with control type, effect and implementation level. First among them are Model scanning for backdoors, Neural cleanse techniques and Activation clustering analysis.
- Which EU AI Act obligations does Backdoor ML Model touch?
- The catalogue maps this threat to Art. 9, Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 53 Abs. 1 Buchst. c und d and Art. 55 of the EU AI Act. In the obligations compass this leads to: Establish and operate a risk management system, Draw up the technical documentation of the model, Provide information to downstream providers, Respect copyright and summarise the training content and Evaluate and mitigate systemic risks. Whether an obligation applies depends on role, risk class and deadline.
Assess this threat in your own system
The live demo contains all 52 threats of this catalogue, including the EU AI Act and GDPR assessment. The free single modules cover AI risk, the EU AI Act and GDPR. No sign-up; the assessment runs locally in your browser.
Cite this entry
For reports, policies or internal documents; the link leads directly to this entry.
“Backdoor ML Model”. Versatile AI Risk Assessment, AI threat catalogue, as of October 2026. https://www.versatile-ai-risk-assessment.com/en/wissensbasis/threats/backdoor-ml-model/