Versatile AI Risk Assessment

Checking frameworks and evidenceFrameworks ThreatsSVG

What a framework reaches and what remains without a reference

Choose one framework or several. The grid shows, for each of the 52 threats, whether the selection contains at least one applicable reference. Each gap names the other frameworks that do reach that threat.

For anyone choosing a framework or already committed to one

Coverage gaps

OWASP LLM Top 10 reaches 45 of the 52 threats. 7 remain open, of which 7 have a reference in another framework.

1framework selected
45/52threats with at least one reference
7threats without any reference
74references in the selection
  1. Supply Chain and Provenance3/3

  2. Model and Training Data Manipulation4/4

  3. Prompt Attacks and Guardrail Evasion5/5

  4. Attacks on the Running Model and Service6/7

  5. Privacy and Data Leakage4/4

  6. Application and Integration Security6/7

  7. Harmful Content6/9

  8. Malicious Use for Attacks, Fraud and Disinformation2/4

  9. Agentic and Autonomous AI5/5

  10. Reliability and Responsible Use4/4

Select a threat to see its references across all frameworks.

Without a reference in the selection · 7

Framework mappingsThe framework mappings show which references a framework carries in detail.

The file shows the current state including any filters and carries the note, catalogue version and source.

A reference means the catalogue identifies a place in the framework as applicable. Mappings indicate relevance and applicability, not evidence of compliance. A missing reference means the catalogue contains no mapping from that threat to the selected framework. Consult the original document and additional sources as needed.

Versatile AI Risk Assessment is an aid for structuring AI risks and making them transparent. It does not replace legal or professional advice and makes no binding decisions.

Further analyses

The same data, a different question

The other nine analyses, searchable and filterable by perspective like the overview; those of the same perspective first.

Show filters
No filter set, the list shows the complete collection.9 of 9 further analyses

Checking frameworks and evidence

Evidence base

What is this based on?

Checking frameworks and evidence

Framework mappings

Where is this anchored professionally and legally?

Understanding threats

Lifecycle

When does which risk arise?

Placing your own system

System context

Which threats affect my system?

Planning mitigations

Effect matrix

How and where do mitigations take effect?

Planning mitigations

Ownership

What types of mitigations are there?

Overview of all ten analyses with all filters

Related
Threat catalogue

All 52 threats in full: description, impact, example, mitigations and verified sources.

To the catalogue
EU AI Act quick check

Six questions along the EU AI Act and a deadline plan with the obligations that apply to your system.

To the quick check
Obligations compass

Choose a role and a risk class and see which EU AI Act obligations apply from when, with legal reference and evidence.

To the obligations compass
Assess it yourself

The full assessment with system context, threat selection and evidence tracking, free of charge in the browser.

To the live demo