All 52 threats in full: description, impact, example, mitigations and verified sources.
To the catalogue486 verified relations between seven frameworks and ten topic groups
Each ribbon connects a framework with a topic group of the catalogue; its thickness corresponds to the number of verified relations. Select a framework or a group to see the concrete references. For the EU AI Act and the GDPR, the applicability condition of the respective provision is shown as well.
Who it is for: For compliance, legal, internal audit and assurance
Framework mappings
Nothing selected yet. Each ribbon connects a framework with a topic group.
Mappings indicate relevance and applicability, not evidence of compliance. The applicability condition states the preconditions under which a provision applies at all.
Versatile AI Risk Assessment is an aid for structuring AI risks and making them transparent. It does not replace legal or professional advice and makes no binding decisions.
The same data, a different question
Which provision applies, what it does not reach and which primary source the catalogue relies on.
-
Coverage gaps
What does my framework not reach?
For anyone choosing a framework or already committed to one
-
Evidence base
What is this based on?
For assessors, internal audit and anyone judging how solid a source is
- Threat pathway How does harm arise?
- Lifecycle When does which risk arise?
- Threat comparison Where does the line between two run?
- System context Which threats affect my system?
- Architecture change What does a rebuild trigger?
- Effect matrix How and where do mitigations take effect?
- Ownership Who has to act?
From the analysis to the assessment
Four short sections along the EU AI Act for a first, non‑binding orientation of your system.
To the quick checkThe full assessment with system context, threat selection and evidence tracking, free of charge in the browser.
To the live demo