Versatile AI Risk Assessment

Planning mitigationsMitigationsSVG

The 265 mitigations by control type and topic group

This view shows technical, organisational and other control types. Use it as a basis for assigning responsibilities within your organisation. The switch also includes complementary control types in the counts.

For leadership, security ownership and anyone who has to assign responsibilities

Ownership

265 mitigations yield 265 assignments. Most frequent type: Technical with 217. Without a mitigation in this scope: Physical & environmental.

265mitigations in this selection
265assignments, first type only
82 %of which technical
48assignments outside technology

44mostly technical · 73 %

41mostly technical · 76 %

36mostly technical · 97 %

26mostly technical · 88 %

25mostly technical · 64 %

23mostly technical · 91 %

20mostly technical · 100 %

20mostly technical · 80 %

18mostly technical · 89 %

12mostly technical · 58 %

Select a control type or a bar segment to see the mitigations behind it with their full classification.

Effect matrixThe effect matrix shows at which implementation level these mitigations act.

The file shows the current state including any filters and carries the note, catalogue version and source.

The control type describes what kind of mitigation it is, not how costly or how effective it is. Neither an effort distribution nor a staffing plan can be derived from the share.

Versatile AI Risk Assessment is an aid for structuring AI risks and making them transparent. It does not replace legal or professional advice and makes no binding decisions.

Further analyses

The same data, a different question

The other nine analyses, searchable and filterable by perspective like the overview; those of the same perspective first.

Show filters
No filter set, the list shows the complete collection.9 of 9 further analyses

Planning mitigations

Effect matrix

How and where do mitigations take effect?

Understanding threats

Lifecycle

When does which risk arise?

Placing your own system

System context

Which threats affect my system?

Checking frameworks and evidence

Coverage gaps

What does my framework not reach?

Checking frameworks and evidence

Evidence base

What is this based on?

Checking frameworks and evidence

Framework mappings

Where is this anchored professionally and legally?

Overview of all ten analyses with all filters

Related
Threat catalogue

All 52 threats in full: description, impact, example, mitigations and verified sources.

To the catalogue
EU AI Act quick check

Six questions along the EU AI Act and a deadline plan with the obligations that apply to your system.

To the quick check
Obligations compass

Choose a role and a risk class and see which EU AI Act obligations apply from when, with legal reference and evidence.

To the obligations compass
Assess it yourself

The full assessment with system context, threat selection and evidence tracking, free of charge in the browser.

To the live demo